Monday, December 15, 2014

CBC condemns CFIA over beef recall

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is condemning the Canadian Food Inspection Agency for its role in a recall of 31,000 pounds of  ground beef Cargill Meat Solutions of Calgary supplied to Wal-Mart stores across Western Canada.

FoodNet Canada idenfied E. coli 0157:H7 in a sample of the meat it picked up from a Wal-Mart store in British Columbia and alerted the CFIA on Nov. 28 about its test results.

The public notice of a recall didn’t go out from the CFIA until Dec. 3, past the “best before” dating on the packaged meat that was shipped from Calgary Nov. 19 and 20.

“The timelines suggest the entire food safety system managed by Canadian Food Inspection Agency failed to either detect . . . or recall the problem batch . . .” says the CBC.

The CBC further reports that the  “CFIA says it began an investigation immediately. But, the meat was not ordered recalled until after confirmatory test results were known on Dec. 1.

“Then the agency asked for a risk assessment to be performed.  The results of that analysis came back late on Dec. 1.


The news release announcing the recall to consumers was dated that same day, but was not sent out by distribution services until the next morning -- three full days after the first packages of meat would have begun to pass their best before dates.”

I think the CBC is unduly harsh on the CFIA. First, there have been no reports of anybody getting sick, so maybe the populations of E. Coli 0157:H7 in the ground beef were quite low.

Second, it's not the CFIA that is mainly responsible for sampling and testing meat at the packing plant. That's the responsibility of Cargill Meat Solutions. The CFIA's role has been to check that the company's random sampling and testing protocols and performance meet standards.

Third, a great deal of reputation, plus significant costs, are involved in a public recall. Given that Wal-Mart was involved across the Western provinces, it's understandable that the CFIA wanted to be sure that the FoodNet Canada results were accurate, and not a false positive or a flawed sample collection.